Tuesday, March 12, 2019

How To Shoot Macro

Please help KenRockwell..com
Nikon R1C1 SU-800 SB-R200
Nikon D200 with 105 mm lens and R1C1 flash system.
My biggest source of support for this free website is when you use those or any of these links when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live — but I receive nothing for my efforts if you buy elsewhere. I'm not NPR; I get no government hand-outs and run no pledge drives to support my research, so please always use any of these links for the best prices and service whenever you get anything. Thanks for helping me help you! Ken.

February 2014   Better Pictures   Nikon   Canon    Fuji    LEICA   All Reviews
Best Macro Lenses
 
Introduction         top
Adorama pays top dollar for your used gear.
I use these stores. I can't vouch for ads below.
Back in 1999, there were no practical DSLRs (the world's first 2.7 megapixel Nikon D1 didn't ship until Christmas 1999 — for a bargain $5,000!), compact cameras were crummy and the iPhone was still almost ten years away in the future. If you were serious about great closeup photos in 1999 when I started this website, you needed a 35mm or larger SLR and very specialized macro lenses.
It's not 1999 anymore. Today, even the cheapest DSLRs come with kit lenses that already get very close, compact digital cameras almost always have macro modes that get within about an inch of the lens, and even the iPhone 5 gets super-close all by itself.
Want great close-up shots? Just be sure to wait a moment for your camera or iPhone to focus, and even the iPhone works great for super close-ups:
Casio Oceanus, 17 June 2013
Rockwell's Watch, 17 June 2013. (iPhone 5, f/2.4 at 1/2,358 at ISO 50.) bigger.
Snail Family
Snail farm, 07 June 2013. (cropped from iPhone 5, f/2.4 at 1/120 at ISO 50.) grosser.
Only if you are really serious about your macro work or need to get closer than these shots do you need anything fancier.
If you want to get closer, don't even bother with 50mm or 105mm macro lenses; skip all the way to the Canon 180mm Macro or the Nikon 200mm Macro lenses. Here's why:

Distance
Macro photos are often thought of as close-ups, but as macro pros know all too well, you don't really want to get too close trying to do it.
If you get the camera too close, you:
1.) Get in the way of your own lighting.
2.) Annoy live subjects like bugs.
and
3.) Show the subject in an unnatural perspective, since we'd never really be that close when looking at it ourselves. For instance, in the iPhone shot above from a few inches (10 cm) away, my watch looks much bigger than my wrist because it's so much closer to the lens than my wrist. This isn't natural — do you really think my watch face is as wide as my wrist?
Therefore, we want a longer lens for macro photography, not a 50mm, 55mm or 60mm lens.
 
Lens Choices     (see also Best Macro Lenses)

Lens Sharpness
Guess what: it doesn't matter!
While some macro lenses may be sharper than others for regular photography, as you'll learn below, there is no depth-of-field at macro distances so nothing is in perfect focus anyway. No matter how sharp your lens, it won't matter because nothing will be in perfect enough focus to notice.
Since you'll be shooting at around f/32 to try to get at least one tiny swath in focus, diffraction is the limiting factor regardless of lens.

50mm Lenses
50mm macro lenses are useless for serious macro work except for copying slides, stamps and other flat artwork.
Any flatbed scanner does a better, faster and easier job for photographing anything small and flat.
50mm, 55mm and 60mm macro lenses are foolish for serious macro use precisely because you have to get too close, so we'll pass on the 50-60mm range.
Nikon 60mm Micro working distance
Nikon 60mm f/2.8 G at closest focus distance: too close to be useful.
By the time we get close enough for a big enough image with a 60mm macro, there are only inches between the end of our lens and our subject. We can't light the subject, it gets annoyed, and it looks funny.

100mm and 105mm Lenses
Ideally we want at least a 100mm macro lens so that we can be far enough away so we don't annoy the bugs, are able to light our subject, and for them to be seen from a reasonably normal perspective.
We are used to seeing everything from at least a foot or two away (50 cm). Our eyes aren't comfortable — or can't — focus closer than about a foot (30 cm), so macro photos made closer than this give unnatural perspectives. Be they bugs or products, three-dimensional objects look weirder than they should when shot from a only foot away.
Only at least a 100mm lens lets us get far enough away, and still have enough magnification for our macro shots.

180mm and 200mm Lenses
Macro pros all use 180mm or 200mm macro lenses precisely so we can get far enough away, and still get close enough.
With a 200mm macro, you'll have a foot or two of clearance ("working distance") between the lens and your subject, so you'll be able to light it well, and its perspective won't be all screwed up.
Paying attention? With my favorite Nikon 200mm f/4 AF-D, I still have less than 11 inches (260mm) between the front of my lens and my subject at its closest focus distance. For most subjects I shoot a few inches to a foot (10-30 cm) wide, I can stand a couple of feet away to have enough breathing room. Whew! This is why we need 200mm macro lenses.

Magnification and Reproduction Ratios
Magnification ratios, the same as reproduction ratios, are the ratio between the size of your subject and the size of the image at the sensor or film. Of course when displayed or printed there is even more magnification.
Most macro lenses have the reproduction ratios engraved on the focusing scale. This is handy for forensic and scientific work.

Definitions
Macro is defined as photos which are made between 1/10 life size and life size — at the sensor. The resulting prints will be even bigger depending on the size of the print.
Normal photography is defined as less than 1/10 life size at the sensor, and microphotography is defined as greater than life size. Don't worry about this, since even these terms are defined differently by different people. For instance, Nikon, who also makes many microscopes, refers to their macro lenses as "micro" lenses.

Focus Modes
Serious macro work is shot in manual focus because it's faster and easier.
Unless your subject is flat, in which case a scanner is a much better idea than a camera, autofocus gets lost and has no idea on what to focus when you're up close to a real three-dimensional subject.
Therefore, it doesn't matter if you use an auto- or manual-focus lens! You'll set your AF to manual anyway, so don't presume you have to buy a new AF lens when a used manual-focus Nikon lens will work exactly as well — and save you a lot of money.
Hand motion alone changes camera distance so much and so quickly that it drives any AF system crazy.
I sometimes focus my lens and then focus by moving the camera back and forth. This keeps framing constant. Small variations in your position become huge variations in image size, so fixing the focus and moving the camera keeps this stable.

Apertures and Depth of Field
There is no depth of field at macro distances.
Because there is no depth-of-field when you're this close, shoot everything at about f/32.
Try to orient your subjects so they lie in the plane of focus. For instance, you have to snap butterflies when their wings are lying flat. If you can do this you can get the entire bug sharp, otherwise you get an amateur looking photo.
With bugs, pro macro shooters spend a lot of time trying to get the wings to lie perfectly flat, because even at f/32, they'll be out of focus if they move a millimeter (1/32") up or down from the plane of focus.
Shoot at larger than f/32 and you'll get too little in focus, and shoot smaller and you'll start to loose sharpness from diffraction. f/22 to f/45 are all you'll ever need.

Image Stabilization and VR
Image stabilization and VR are useless with live subjects like flowers, bugs and animals which are always moving. VR and IS can only counteract camera motion, not subject motion.
VR and IS might help when using a macro lens as a general-purpose telephoto, but are of no help for close-in macro shooting because they usually aren't calibrated to work at macro distances anyway, and when shooting at f/32, your exposures would be way too long to hand-hold even with IS or VR.
VR and IS only work in two axes, or three axes in a camera maker's dreams. Even three-axis VR or IS can't do anything to help prevent camera motion forwards and back. When we're focused at close macro distances, a millimeter (1/32") of motion will ruin a hand-held macro photo.
Therefore, when shooting serious macro, you don't need to worry about getting a lens with VR or IS. It's just a marketing tactic to sell newer and more expensive lenses. I do this for a living, and use my non-VR Nikon 200mm f/4 AF-D every day.

Lighting
This is easy: use flash!
Flash lets you easily shoot at f/32 and stops any action or camera motion. Available light is asking for trouble, since you'll be shooting at larger apertures eliminating any of what little depth of field you might have, or will lead you to perilously long exposures at smaller apertures.
Most bug photographers use two flashes mounted on opposite sides of the lens. I use a Lepp Bracket which holds two flashes, one on each side of the camera. This becomes a clumsy contraption with the flashes and sync cables.
An elegant solution for bugs is Nikon's R1C1 system shown at the top of the page. It uses special small flashes which screw into the front of your lens. It also eliminates all the wires. It may pay for itself in convenience, light weight and simplicity for bug and flower shots.
I have not used ring lights. The off-brand one I tried had too little power, and the overall lighting was duller from the complete ring than the two-point lighting from two discrete flashes. If the light gets too soft, you won't see surface texture.
Personally, my macro work is product photography, and for that, I use plug-in-the-wall studio strobes. A set of real studio strobes costs about the same as buying a bunch of battery-powered flashes, but has far more power and flexibility to add umbrellas and light modifiers easily. Studio strobes are made to sit on light stands, while battery powered flashes require a lot of fiddling to get them to stay put on light stands. See Product Photography for more.

Bigger than Life Size
You can add extension tubes or bellows between your lens and camera body. I always focus manually, so these extensions being manual focus only is no bother.
Close up lenses don't help much with today's lenses, since they already get so close.
You also can use teleconverters, which will let even the oldest macro lenses get to life size, and all macro lenses today to twice life-size, at the sensor. I used to add my TC-200 to my 105 AF Micro before I got a 200mm macro. Of course my TC-200 is manual focus, not a problem since I focus manually in macro anyway.
Canon makes a very special 65mm f/2.8 closeup-only lens which works between life size and five-times life size. It sold for $830 in 2005, and $950 in 2013. The bug and raindrop guys love these, too, but it's not going to replace a regular macro lens for general use.

Exposure
I manually set the camera to f/32 for depth of field and set the shutter to the flash sync speed (1/125 to 1/500 depending on your camera) to eliminate ambient light.
I use the TTL flash system to let the flash control itself for perfect exposure as I vary distance, except when I use my manual studio strobes, for which I simply look at the results on my LCD and adjust accordingly.

Bellows Factors
In the old days we spent a lot of time worrying about exposure variations as we got closer. This is because the lens moves away from the film or sensor as you get closer and reduces the effective aperture. The effective aperture reduces by two stops at life size!
Today the Nikon cameras automatically correct the aperture of the macro lenses to give the same effective f/stop as you get closer. Of course your f/2.8 lens is only an f/5.6 lens at life size, but at f/32 you won't even notice this. Remember macro lenses are only used at full aperture for focusing and framing, not shooting.
Don't worry; your TTL exposure system reads right through all this automatically.

Camera Support
I always hand hold.
The flash freezes any motion for perfect sharpness so there's no need for a tripod.
If using a tripod you'll need a geared positional mount which allows you to shift the entire camera left and right or forward and back to get the precise framing you need. It's almost impossible to lift and move a tripod precisely by the fractions of an inch needed in macro work.

Other Formats
Physics makes this easier as the sensor or film gets smaller. As film gets bigger the depth of field collapses to nothing, and the f/stops are approaching pinholes and eliminating resolution due to diffraction and making lighting impossible.
Macro shooting is trivial with point-and-shoot digital cameras and iPhone, easy with digital and 35 mm SLRs, doable with medium format cameras and next to impossible with 4 x 5" cameras.

Compact Digital Cameras
Most point and shoot digital cameras have built-in macro modes which let you get as close as an inch.
These cameras focus most closely at the widest zoom setting, where you usually get a lot of barrel distortion which curves out straight lines along the sides of the image. Try zooming them in a bit towards tele, and expect that they usually can't get quite as close at the tele setting. You have to find the best zoom setting for each camera.
The distortion is usually easy to fix in Photoshop, but you can't fix the weird point of view you get from shooting too close with a wide lens.
Zoom as long as you can and get as far away as you can to frame the photo you need.

Medium Format
Forget rangefinder cameras like my beloved Mamiya 7 and 6. They just don't get close enough.
Use an SLR like the Hasselblad or Contax 645. Not only can you focus close enough and get dedicated macro lenses, the SLR viewing lets you see what you're getting and make exposure measurements through the lens.
SLR cameras with bellows like the Fuji GX680 system and old Rollei SLX are even better because every lens can focus extremely closely.

Large Format
Unless you're a professional jewelry photographer you'll probably want to skip this.
It is very tedious because you need to calculate your bellows factors manually. See a book like Ansel Adams' "The Camera" or Steve Simmon's "Using the View Camera" for the calculations.
I do the calculations once for each lens and mark the factors on a long strip of paper. I hold the paper to the camera and read off the correction depending on lens extension. Calumet sells calculator sticks, which are rulers marked with the factors for different lenses. Some calculators are viewed through the ground glass and the factors read off by how many 1 cm graduations they cross. I told you this got complicated!
You'll need a lot of light and will probably need a set of studio strobes like the Novatrons.

Help me help you         top
I support my growing family through this website, as crazy as it might seem.
The biggest help is when you use any of these links when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. It costs you nothing, and is this site's, and thus my family's, biggest source of support. These places have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. I recommend them all personally.
If you find this page as helpful as a book you might have had to buy or a workshop you may have had to take, feel free to help me continue helping everyone.
If you've gotten your gear through one of my links or helped otherwise, you're family. It's great people like you who allow me to keep adding to this site full-time. Thanks!
If you haven't helped yet, please do, and consider helping me with a gift of $5.00.
As this page is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, especially in the form of printouts for personal use. If you wish to make a printout for personal use, you are granted one-time permission only if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or part thereof. Thank you!

Thanks for reading!

Minolta Maxxum AF Macro 50mm 1.8 lens


lens when they’re attached to the latest cameras?
I went to my local camera stores and purchased the following lenses to experiment with:

  • 1985 Minolta 70-210mm f/4 – Price paid: $100
  • 1986 Minolta 100mm f/2.8 Macro (1:1 reproduction ratio) – Price paid: $275
  • 1985 Minolta 50mm f/1.7 – Price paid: $50
  • 1985 Minolta 28mm f/2.8 – Price paid: $95
In addition to the lenses, I had to buy an adapter that would allow me to mount the lenses to my Sony A7; they’re different style connections. I paid $13 for this. The adapter I bought is just a dumb piece of metal. That means manual focus of the lens and manual control of the lens’ aperture (f-stop).
At first I thought that the manual focus bit would be a pain in the butt and result in missed shots and lots of frustration. I couldn’t have been more wrong. The Sony A7 was blessed with an awesome feature called Focus Peaking. What this does is show you in the viewfinder what is in focus by highlighting those areas with a scattering of red dots. If you see red scatter in and around the thing you’re focusing on, you know you’ve got it.
The electronic viewfinder (EVF) of the Sony A7 is quite clear and high enough resolution to make this very easy to see. You can even set one of the programmable buttons on the camera body to zoom in to 100% image size in area of your choosing if you’re doing some super fine focus adjustments like in Macro Photography. Manual focus on these cameras is simple.
In fact, it’s so simple that I now prefer it over autofocus. With autofocus, even with my big Nikons, sometimes it just selects the wrong feature to focus on and ruins the shot (camera set to center focus spot – focus then compose). I’m very picky about what’s in focus especially when you have a fast lens which have very shallow depth-of-field when used wide open; so fine that you could have eye lashes in focus while the eye is not.
I’ve digressed… Manual focusing these Minolta lenses has been a dream!
What I want to do now is give the writing a rest and just show you photos made with each of these lenses over the past few weeks. In the caption beneath each image I’ll list which lens was used for that shot.




Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 1/320th | ISO 400
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 1/320th | ISO 400
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/200th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/200th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/200th | ISO 320
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/200th | ISO 320
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/250th | ISO 400
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/250th | ISO 400
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/400th | ISO 800
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/400th | ISO 800
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/250th | ISO 1000
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/250th | ISO 1000
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/400th | ISO 400
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/400th | ISO 400
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/50th | ISO 50
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/50th | ISO 50
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/100th | ISO 500
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/100th | ISO 500
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/400th | ISO 125
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/400th | ISO 125
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/1600th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/1600th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 1/640th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 1/640th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/? 1/125th | ISO 640
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/? 1/125th | ISO 640
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/100th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/100th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 1/250th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 1/250th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/200th | ISO 250
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/200th | ISO 250
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/? 1/500th | ISO 3200
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/? 1/500th | ISO 3200
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/4 1/160th | ISO 4000
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/4 1/160th | ISO 4000
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 160th | ISO 100 | Studio strobe used for lighting
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 160th | ISO 100 | Studio strobe used for lighting
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/4 1/250th | ISO 200
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/4 1/250th | ISO 200
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 1/320th | ISO 400
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 50mm f/1.7 | f/? 1/320th | ISO 400
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/400th | ISO 320
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 100mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/400th | ISO 320
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/60th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 28mm f/2.8 | f/? 1/60th | ISO 100
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/4 1/400th | ISO 500
Sony A7 w/ Minolta 70-210mm f/4 | f/4 1/400th | ISO 500
Not bad for “outdated” lenses eh? Since shooting manually with these lenses, I’ve found it requires a little more attention to the process of getting the shot. This results in more attention being paid to the image itself; composition, lighting, and perspective all get a little more consideration too because I’m taking an extra moment to think about what I’m doing. I like this a lot!
The past few weeks spent shooting with this collection of Minoltas has rekindled my enjoyment of photography in a way I haven’t experienced in years. I have recently sold my Zeiss lenses and committed myself to using these Old Timers for the foreseeable future.

Thursday, March 7, 2019

Minolta 50mm F2.8 lens


https://kenrockwell.com/minolta/maxxum/50mm-f28.htm

Minolta Maxxum 50mm f/2.8 (55mm filters, 11.1 oz./315 g, about $200 used if you know How to Win at eBay; I paid only $159 for this one for instance). My biggest source of support is when you use this link directly to them at eBay, or use any of these links when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Please always use these links when getting any of your gear so I can continue to share what I know for free — but I receive nothing for my efforts if you buy elsewhere. Thank you for your support! Ken.
Sample Image Files
Ryan and Dada, 7:28 AM.
Unocal, 13 December 2013. 2013 Sony A7, Sony LA-EA4 adapter, 1985 Minolta MAXXUM 50mm f/2.8 Macro, 1/500 at f/8 at Auto ISO 100. Camera-original © file.

GL550 Headlight, 29 May 2013
GL550. (Sony A99, Minolta MAXXUM AF 50mm f/2.8, f/9 at 1/320 at Auto ISO 100.) Full-Resolution.

Casio Oceanus, 28 May 2013
Casio Oceanus at 1:1. (Sony A99, Minolta MAXXUM AF 50mm f/2.8, f/5.6 at 1/160 at Auto ISO 100.) Full-Resolution. Note: the curved watch crystal degrades the image of the watch face.

La Jolla Post Office, 29 May 2013
La Jolla Post Office, 29 May 2013. (Sony A99, Minolta MAXXUM AF 50mm f/2.8, f/8 at 1/320 at Auto ISO 100.) Full-Resolution.

Ryan and his finger
Katie and her hat from school, 29 May 2013 (Sony A99, Minolta MAXXUM AF 50mm f/2.8 Macro, f/13 at 1/160 at Auto ISO 100, Sony HVL-F20AM flash, Athentech Perfectly Clear plug-in.) bigger.

June 2013   Minolta   Sony   Pentax   Nikon   Canon   All Reviews   Better Pictures
Why fixed lenses take better pictures.
Sony 50mm f/2.8 Macro (same optics as this lens).
 Introduction         top
Intro   Specifications   Performance   Compared   Recommendations
Adorama pays top dollar for your used gear.
This Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm f/2.8 is a macro lens for all Minolta MAXXUM and Sony Alpha cameras. Used on today's Sony A99 it has image stabilization and ultra-fast autofocus. it does the same thing as Sony's 50mm f/2.8 for less than half the price.
It works perfectly on the Sony A99, except that the AF-D Depth Map AF (whatever that is) and the automatic lens corrections don't work. So what, the images look great and everything else works, like face recognition and all the focus modes including Direct Manual Focus (DMF) override, so all is well.
This Minolta has a plastic exterior, but does have a metal mount and metal focus ring.
This is a full-frame lens for 35mm film and full-frame digital, and will be reviewed thusly. Feel free to use this on cropped-frame cameras, too.
This is the world's first autofocus macro lens, introduced with the Minolta MAXXUM 7000.
This is also the world's first lens that can focus continuously from infinity to 1:1 life-sized. It uses a three-group floating optical system.

History
1985-1993
This is the world's first autofocus macro lens. I am reviewing this version specifically.

1993-2000
Minolta added a rubber focus ring and a focus lock button in 1993.
It has exactly the same optics.
I don't know if the barrel is still solid alloy or not.
Casual amateurs call this the "Restyled" or "RS" version. Minolta doesn't use these words.

1995-?
Minolta offered a cheaper f/3.5 50mm macro lens.
It has nothing to do with the f/2.8 lenses reviewed and discussed here, and I will mention it no more in this review.
 
2001-2006
Minolta added distance encoding to the 1993 version and added a "G" to the marketing name.
It also has exactly the same optics as the 1985 version.

2006-today
Sony bought Minolta in 2006, and changed the name to Sony.
I has the same optics as the 1985 version and the same buttons as the 1993 version.

Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm f/2.8
Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm f/2.8 at closest 1:1 distance (0.2 meters). enlarge.

Specifications         top
Intro   Specifications   Performance   Compared   Recommendations

Name        top
Minolta calls this the MAXXUM AF 50mm f/2.8 (32).
MAXXUM is Minolta's autofocus brand, called Dynax outside the US.
The (32) is the smallest f/stop.
Note on this lens the original form of the MAXXUM name, with overlapping Xs.

Optics        top
7 elements in 6 groups.
"Double Floating System," with three different groups of elements moving around to provide optimum performance at every magnification from infinity to 1:1.
Coated mostly in blue, with a green multicoated surface or two.

Diaphragm        top
Front, Minolta MAXXUM AF 50mm f/2.8
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 at f/32. bigger.
7 straight blades.
Stops down to f/32.
Non-compensating system. We lose 1-2/3 stops of light at 1:1, and the camera still tells us that this is an f/2.8 lens — even though it's really only an f/5 lens at 1:1.

Coverage        top
35mm film, full-frame and smaller format digital.

Focal Length        top
50mm.
When used on an APS-C style camera, sees an angle of view similar to what a 80mm lens sees when used on a full-frame or 35mm camera.

Angle of View         top
46.7º on full-frame.

Close Focus        top
0.656 feet (0.2 meters or 7.87 inches) from the image plane.

Working Distance        top
About 2 inches (50mm) from the front of the lens!
 
Maximum Reproduction Ratio        top
1:1 (1.0 x life size).

Hard Infinity Focus Stop?        top
Yes.
This is great for astronomy; just turn to the stop and you have fixed laboratory-perfect focus all night.

Focus Scale        top
Yes.

Depth-of-Field Scale        top
Yes, but abbreviated.

Infra-Red Focus Index        top
Yes.

Aperture Ring        top
No.

Filter Thread        top
55mm.
Does not rotate.

Size        top
2.66" (67.5mm) diameter by 2.36" ~ 3.94" (60 ~ 100 mm) extension from flange.
It gets longer as focused more closely.

Weight        top
11.125 oz. (315.4 g), actual measured.
Minolta specifies 10.9 oz. (310g).

Hood        top
No hood is needed; the lens is very deeply set inside its own conical baffle.

Caps        top
55mm snap-in front cap and standard MAXXUM rear cap.

Quality         top
Made in Japan.

Minolta Product Number        top
25641.

Price, USA        top
About $200 used if you know How to Win at eBay.
People pay from $130 to $290 for them in 2013.

Performance         top
Intro   Specifications   Performance   Compared   Recommendations

Overall       performance     top
The Minolta 50mm f/2.8 works very well, especially on a Sony A99, with ultra-fast autofocus and great sharpness.
It's sharp, but not as sharp as Nikon's similar 55mm f/2.8 AF Micro NIKKOR.

Autofocus       performance     top

AF Speed
AF speed is ultra fast, with one full turn (two half-turns) of the AF screw bringing it from infinity down to 2.5 feet. This is twice as fast as the new Sony 50mm f/1.4, for instance.
The 50 macro has to cover a lot of ground with its huge focus range, and it does so quickly. On an A99 or MAXXUM 7000, it will rack itself all the way from one stop to the other without much waiting.

AF Accuracy
On the Sony A99, focus is great; I don't need any AF fine-tuning.

Manual Focus
Manual focus is fast; a 180º turn of the ring brings you from infinity to 1:1.
It's fast, but not that precise for general use; it's perfect for macro use.

Distortion       performance     top
The Minolta 50mm f/2.8 has no visible distortion.
For scientific use, what little distortion it has can be corrected by using these factors in Photoshop's lens distortion filter:
On full-frame
-0.5
10' (3m)
-0.9
© 2013 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved.

Ergonomics (handling and ease-of-use)       performance     top
Minolta 50mm f/2.8
Minolta 50mm f/2.8.
Ergonomics are easy; the whole lens is a handle for mounting and unmounting.
Swapping between auto and manual focus requires moving a switch on the camera, or maybe using the Sony A99's DMF mode, any of which can be a big pain depending on your camera.

Falloff (darkened corners)       performance     top
Falloff on FX and 35mm is visible at f/2.8, and gone otherwise.
The Shading Correction in the Sony A99 probably doesn't recognize this lens; I leave it OFF.
I've exaggerated the falloff by shooting a gray field and placing these on a gray background.

Minolta AF 50mm f/2.8 falloff on full frame and 35mm, no correction:
Repro Ratio
f/2.8
f/4
f/5.6
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
1:5
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
1:2
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
1:1
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 falloff
© 2013 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved.

Filters, use with       performance     top
There is no problem with vignetting on full-frame with any normal filter, or even two stacked filters.
The filter ring doesn't rotate.

Flash Exposure        performance     top
This original 1985 Minolta MAXXUM AF 50 apparently has distance encoding, and gives great exposure with flash, even shot into a mirror with the flash shining back at itself.
Rockwell in the mirror,  28 May 2013
Rockwell in the mirror. (Sony A99, Minolta MAXXUM AF 50mm f/2.8, f/5 at 1/100 at Auto ISO 100, Sony HVL-F20AM flash.)

Focus Breathing       performance     top
Of interest mostly to cinematographers focusing back and forth between two subjects, the image of a fixed subject continuously gets larger as the lens is focused from infinity to 1:1.

Ghosts       performance     top
Ghosts are no problem with this multicoated lens, even on the complex Sony A99 which has all sorts of internal mirrors in the optical shooting shooting path.
Here's looking directly into the disk of the sun, which was blinding in person:
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 ghosts
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 at f/8. enlarge.
If you go as far out of your way as I did here, there is a slight green blob opposite the sun, and more commonly seen, a small blue blob just outside the light source.
I'm unsure if the veiling flare seen here is from the lens, or from the fixed mirror in the optical path of the Sony A99 on which I shot this.

Hood       performance     top
No hood is needed; the lens barrel is already deeply conical.
 
Lateral Color Fringes       performance     top
None, on an uncorrected 24 MP Sony A99.

Macro       performance     top
It gets to 1:1, meaning something 24 x 36mm fills your image on full-frame, or something 16 x 24mm fills your image on smaller-format digital cameras.
It's super-sharp throughout most of the image, even at f/2.8, if you're in perfect focus.
I expected this; this is what macro lenses do.
The real problem is that no 50mm lens is good for macro, unless you're copying slides. Otherwise at 1:1, there is only two inches (5 centimeters) between your subject and the front of the lens, so you can't get light in.
For more serious macro, use the Minolta MAXXUM 100mm f/2.8 Macro instead.
 
Mechanics and Construction       performance     top
Minolta 50mm f/2.8
Minolta 50mm f/2.8 Macro. enlarge.
The Minolta 50mm f/2.8 is typical 1980s plastic.

Filter Threads and First Barrel
Plastic.
Inner Barrel (seen only as front extends)
Metal.
Focus Ring
Solid metal with engraved magnification numbers.
Barrel Exterior
Plastic.
Identity Ring
None; painted on barrel.
Depth-of-Field Scale
Yes.
Aperture Ring
None.
Mount
Chromed metal.
Barrel Markings
Paint.
Mounting Index Dot
Red plastic ball.
Serial Number
Engraved into bottom of barrel and filled with paint.
Moisture seal at mount
No.
Noises When Shaken
Lots of high-pitched rattling.
Made in
Japan.
Sharpness       performance     top
The MAXXUM 50mm's biggest limitation is softness at the sides and corners wide-open.
As shot on the full-frame 24MP Sony A99:

At f/2.8
The center is already extremely sharp.
The sides and corners are dark and somewhat blurrier. The Nikon 55mm AF is far superior.
At f/4:
The center is perfect, and the sides and corners are now much lighter — but not any sharper.
At f/5.6:
The sides and corners are better than at f/4.
At f/8
f/8 is even sharper at the sides and corners.
At f/11
f/11 is optimum; the sides are very sharp. (The center has been sharp at every aperture.)
At f/16
It's softer all over; diffraction is limiting performance.
At f/22
It's softer all over; diffraction is limiting performance.
At f/32
It's softer all over; diffraction is significantly limiting performance if you don't need it for depth of field.
Spherochromatism       performance     top
Spherochromatism, sometimes mistakenly called "color bokeh" by laymen, is a minor aberration which can add slight color fringes to out-of focus highlights in fast, long lenses.
This lens is neither fast nor long, and I see no spherochromatism.

Sunstars       performance     top
SL500 in La Jolla 29 May 2013
Sunstar on The Star at f/8.

SL500 in La Jolla 29 May 2013
Crop from above Sony A99 1.4x crop image at 100%.
With its conventional 7-bladed diaphragm, the AF 50/2.8 makes great 14-pointed sunstars on brilliant points of light, even at larger apertures. Bravo!

Survivability       performance     top
This Minolta 50mm f/2.8 is from 1985 and is still working perfectly today in 2013 after having been bought from a random stranger on eBay.
It has no motors and no encoders, except maybe a distance encoder. There is nothing critical to go wrong that a good repairman can't fix. The only electronics are a ROM chip that should not wear out unless you go doing something stupid, like trying to take it apart.
It is perfectly normal for the rubber grip on the barrel to turn white from lack of use. The whiteness rubs off with use; a white looking barrel means a lens that hasn't been used much.
Therefore unlike many AF lenses today, this 50 AF Macro ought to last last for plenty of more decades of great pictures.

Compared         top
Intro   Specifications   Performance   Compared   Recommendations
See also Best Macro Lenses Compared.
Minolta downgraded this 50mm AF to much more plastic and rounded the diaphragm, destroying sunstars some years after this model. Otherwise, it's the same thing in an obviously crappier package.
Much later, Minolta downgraded it again to only an f/3.5 macro.
I'm unsure if today's Sony's 50mm f/2.8 uses the same optics or not — it probably does, and adds a focus lock button.
Nikon's 55mm f/2.8 AF (1987-1989) is a copy of this Minolta lens mechanically. They feel the same and look very similar. Optically, the Nikon 55mm is simpler (6 versus 7 elements) and uses only a two-group floating system versus three groups in this Minolta lens — but the Nikon 55mm f/2.8 is one of the sharpest lenses in all of photography, and sharper than this Minolta.
Canon's 50mm f/2.5 Macro (1987-) is a much better made lens mechanically, and is the only one of these 1980s lenses still sold unchanged today. It sells new for not much more ($270) than these Minolta lenses sell for used.
This Canon Macro has better optics than this Minolta, but not as good as the Nikon. The Canon only focuses to 1:2; you need a special adapter to get to 1:1.

Recommendations       top
I bought this Minolta 50mm f/2.8 for my Sony A99 for use as a normal lens.
For a 50mm lens for MAXXUM or Sony, we have three choices: the 50mm f/1.7 MAXXUM lens, the f/1.4 lenses or this f/2.8 macro. This macro focuses much faster and closer than the others, and none of the others is sharper. If f/2.8 is fast enough, then I'd get this macro instead of the faster lenses.
For digital Sony cameras, since their Auto ISO and Program modes tend never to shoot any wider than f/4 even in very dim light, you won't be using the extra speed of the other lenses, so get this macro instead for faster and closer focusing.
For use on 35mm MAXXUM cameras, the f/1.4 is probably best, as you'll need the extra speed on film, and the MAXXUM program modes properly use the largest apertures.
For dedicated macro use, 50mm lenses are a bad idea because you have to get too close to the subject. You block your light and annoy live subjects. Get the MAXXUM 100mm f/2.8 Macro or Sony 100mm f/2.8 Macro instead.
If you've found the time, effort and expense I incur researching and sharing all this information for free, this free website's biggest source of support is when you use this link to get yours at eBay as I did, or use or any of these links when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Please always use these links when getting any of your gear so I can continue to share what I know for free — because I receive nothing for my efforts if you buy elsewhere. I'm not NPR; I don't get any government grants or have annoying fund drives to help me research and give all this information away for free.
Thanks for your support!
Ken.

Help me help you         top
I support my growing family through this website, as crazy as it might seem.
The biggest help is when you use any of these links when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. It costs you nothing, and is this site's, and thus my family's, biggest source of support. These places have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. I recommend them all personally.
If you find this page as helpful as a book you might have had to buy or a workshop you may have had to take, feel free to help me continue helping everyone.
If you've gotten your gear through one of my links or helped otherwise, you're family. It's great people like you who allow me to keep adding to this site full-time. Thanks!
If you haven't helped yet, please do, and consider helping me with a gift of $5.00.
As this page is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, especially in the form of printouts for personal use. If you wish to make a printout for personal use, you are granted one-time permission only if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or part thereof. Thank you!

Thanks for reading!